Antwerp QC, Much of Belgian Core, Leaves Competitive Quidditch
Much like the NCAA basketball tournament that inspired this bracket, chalk—or higher seeds—held strong in the first half of our Round of 32. With the exception of No. 5 Arizona State University’s win over No. 4 University of Missouri, higher seeds swept the round, promising some exciting Sweet 16 matchups.
The closest matchup of the round surprisingly involved a No. 1 seed. Texas A&M University “only” won with 74 percent of the vote, with voters commenting on their drop-off during the World Cup 8 season and lack of major off-field contributions to the sport. It may be something to keep an eye on as they take on the University of Miami in the next round with a potential matchup against Bowling Green State University or Emerson College looming.
Now, attention turns to the right half of the bracket, where the top seeds in two more contentious regions attempt to do the same. We’ll spare you the recaps to these eight blowouts, and save the arguments for these elite programs for another day. For now, get out and vote for the next eight Round of 32 matchups.
No. 1 University of Texas over No. 8 University of Minnesota
Result: 96 percent to 4 percent
No. 5 Arizona State University over No. 4 University of Missouri
Result: 86 percent to 14 percent
No. 3 Ball State University over No. 6 Ohio State University
Result: 89 percent to 11 percent
No. 2 UCLA over No. 10 University of Rochester
Result: 89 percent to 11 percent
No. 1 Texas A&M University over No. 9 Sam Houston State University
Result: 74 percent to 26 percent
No. 4 University of Miami over No. 5 Villanova University
Result: 92 percent to 8 percent
No. 3 Emerson College over No. 6 Hofstra University
Result: 85 percent to 15 percent
No. 2 Bowling Green State University over No. 7 Rutgers University
Result: 90 percent to 10 percent
Archives by Month:
- May 2023
- April 2023
- April 2022
- January 2021
- October 2020
- September 2020
- July 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- August 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- November 2017
- October 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
Archives by Subject:
- Categories
- Awards
- College/Community Split
- Column
- Community Teams
- Countdown to Columbia
- DIY
- Drills
- Elo Rankings
- Fantasy Fantasy Tournaments
- Game & Tournament Reports
- General
- History Of
- International
- IQA World Cup
- Major League Quidditch
- March Madness
- Matches of the Decade
- Monday Water Cooler
- News
- Positional Strategy
- Press Release
- Profiles
- Quidditch Australia
- Rankings Wrap-Up
- Referees
- Rock Hill Roll Call
- Rules and Policy
- Statistic
- Strategy
- Team Management
- Team USA
- The Pitch
- The Quidditch Lens
- Top 10 College
- Top 10 Community
- Top 20
- Uncategorized
- US Quarantine Cup
- US Quidditch Cup