Antwerp QC, Much of Belgian Core, Leaves Competitive Quidditch
SUNY Geneseo is one of the older teams in New York, appearing at World Cup IV with a history going even further back than that. They are one of the top teams in the Snow Belt Conference, battling with RIT and the University of Rochester for local dominance. Geneseo has had a very consistent year; they haven’t lost to any teams who they should be beating, but they also haven’t scored too many big wins.
Best Wins v. University of Ottawa x2 (90*-10, 50*-20) Rochester Institute of Technology 60*- 40
Worst Losses None
Key Players: Joseph Monoenko is one of Geneseo’s tank-like chasers, and fully understands how to use his size to advance the ball as well as to lock down an opposing chaser on offense. He is almost always a scoring threat, and his ability to impose himself physically often allows him to draw extra defenders and open up scoring opportunities for his teammates.
Molly Bowen and Jackie Bowen, known as the twins, are SUNY Geneseo’s two primary beaters. They have excellent communication and work very, very well as a unit, supporting and communicating with each other.
Players to watch: Joey O’Connor had big shoes to fill stepping up as Geneseo’s new seeker this fall with veteran Christian Perfas out for a semester. But he has done admirably, making a number of high profile pulls, such as his catch against Macaulay in the Northeast Regional championship. Joey’s ability and willingness to lay out for a catch, as well as his ability to make a catch from the ground, have held Geneseo in good stead this year.
And, speaking of seekers, Christian Perfas is now back and in good seeking form, using explosive speed and quick hands to make his pulls. Perfas has also debuted on the chasing line with the greater seeking depth allowing him a bit more flexibility. While Perfas doesn’t have experience chasing, he has a great understanding of the game, as well as the speed and agility necessary to beat a defender, so I wouldn’t be surprised to see him doing some damage chasing in the future.
Strategy: Defensively, Geneseo plays a very physical game with their chasers. While running a lineup of three male chasers, a male keeper, and two female beaters, their defensive physicality enables their beaters to remain very close to their hoops and focus on maintaining control while beating chasers who get too close. They tend to have a point chaser challenge the opposing ball carrier and slow them down while their other chasers pick up the passing options. Geneseo is a team which can genuinely shut down opposing offenses without needing to use or risk their bludgers.
Offensively, Geneseo will have one of their keepers, or occasionally a chaser, advance the ball and attempt to beat an opposing point chaser. At that point, if they are unchallenged by a beater, they will drive through to score. If they are challenged, they’ll look for a passing option.
Strengths: Physicality: Geneseo is very able and willing to make hard hits, making it exceptionally difficult for opposing chasers to get in close to their hoops with the ball. But the compactness of their setup sometimes allows chasers with good long shots to get within a dangerous distance of their hoops at times.
Weaknesses: Geneseo struggles when playing against bludger control, both because it forces their beaters out of their comfortable defensive play style, and because their passing, while decent, isn’t quite as crisp as they would like, and can often be shut down by opposing beaters.
Predictions: Geneseo is in a relatively rough pool with Texas State, Pitt, and Michigan State. They’ll be in a tough spot to advance. But, given their seeking, they have a realistic chance to pull an upset if they can stay within snitch range. That said, it’s most likely that SUNY Geneseo doesn’t advance out of pool play.
Archives by Month:
- May 2023
- April 2023
- April 2022
- January 2021
- October 2020
- September 2020
- July 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- August 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- November 2017
- October 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
Archives by Subject:
- Categories
- Awards
- College/Community Split
- Column
- Community Teams
- Countdown to Columbia
- DIY
- Drills
- Elo Rankings
- Fantasy Fantasy Tournaments
- Game & Tournament Reports
- General
- History Of
- International
- IQA World Cup
- Major League Quidditch
- March Madness
- Matches of the Decade
- Monday Water Cooler
- News
- Positional Strategy
- Press Release
- Profiles
- Quidditch Australia
- Rankings Wrap-Up
- Referees
- Rock Hill Roll Call
- Rules and Policy
- Statistic
- Strategy
- Team Management
- Team USA
- The Pitch
- The Quidditch Lens
- Top 10 College
- Top 10 Community
- Top 20
- Uncategorized
- US Quarantine Cup
- US Quidditch Cup